General John Kelly. Photo: Susan Walsh/AP |
At last mainstream reporters have started reporting about
the real General John Kelly.
What finally did Trump’s chief of staff in was the revelation
that he'd shielded former White House staff secretary Rob Porter despite
credible allegations of domestic violence from Porter’s two ex-wives. This
followed bizarre episodes like Kelly’s rewriting
of U.S. history and his
lies about an African-American Congress member. But his record during the
half-year he headed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) should have
alerted observers to the man’s true character long before he moved to the White House.
Wasn’t it a problem that as DHS secretary he floated ideas
for systematically separating child
asylum seekers from their parents, and for deploying
the National Guard in immigration raids? In March the administration
suggested funding expanded immigration enforcement by gutting the Coast Guard, FEMA and the TSA, parts of the government that
sometimes may actually help protect people. If Kelly objected to this bizarre plan,
he didn’t say so. In April he suggested that Congress members who criticized his
department’s immigration raids should change the immigration laws or else “shut
up.” And why did
reporters and editorial writers think the Trump team chose Kelly for the post?
A general headed immigration operations in the 1950s, and the result was
“Operation Wetback.” (See this,
along with a correction.)
With all this information against Kelly, media like the New
York Times still managed to write that the man was “sensible.”
Now that we know otherwise, the Times still isn’t quite admitting to a
mistake. In an article
noting that “Mr. Kelly has drawn a string of unwelcome headlines,” Times
reporters Peter Baker and Maggie Haberman explain that “[w]hen he took the
White House job last summer, [Kelly] was seen by many as a mature figure who
could impose order on a chaotic building.”
Who were the “many” who saw Kelly this way? Not the
immigrants who'd been swept up in his immigration
raids.
No comments:
Post a Comment