Joana Toro /VIEWpress/Corbis via Getty Images |
In a draft article last revised on April 4, law professor
Bill Ong Hing, the author of Defining America
Through Immigration, notes that many major corporations have
denounced the Trump government’s rescission of Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals (DACA). Could they follow through on their denunciations by continuing
to employ DACA recipients after their work permits expire? Professor Hing considers the legal and moral
implications of civil disobedience by employers.—TPOI Editor
The Case for Nongovernmental Sanctuary for Immigrants
By Pratheepan Gulasekaram and Rose Cuison Villazor, Los Angeles Times
April 5, 2018
opposed the policies in recent
weeks. Despite all the bluster, California is likely to prevail.
The Supreme Court's governing interpretation of the 10th Amendment protects the
autonomy of states and prevents them from being conscripted into federal
enforcement programs.
The Trump administration
intensified its fight with California last month when the Department of Justice
filed a lawsuit arguing that the state's so-called sanctuary laws undermine
federal immigration enforcement and are therefore unconstitutional. A few
cities and counties in California have also
Whatever the outcome of the lawsuit, a new development could
undercut the DOJ's anti-sanctuary campaign. Across California and the country,
many institutions of everyday life — churches, schools, employers, businesses
and nonprofits of every stripe — are taking bold steps to protect undocumented
immigrants.[…]
Read the full article:
Beyond DACA – Defying Employer Sanctions Through Civil
Disobedience
By Bill Ong Hing (draft essay)
Last revised April 4, 2018
The fact that DACA recipients — and essentially all Dreamers
— have become part of the conscience of the country and a critical part of the
economy is illustrated by the strong support for them exhibited by major
businesses in the United States. Dozens of CEOs from companies like Microsoft,
Amazon, Netflix, AT&T, Wells Fargo, Google, and Facebook urged the
president to preserve the program. After the Trump Administration announced the
rescission of the DACA program on September 5, 2017, even more companies
denounced the action and called on Congress to pass the Dream Act before the
DACA termination date of March 5, 2018.
Although the statements of support for DACA recipients and
Dreamers, and calls for passage of the Dream Act are important, are employers
willing to do more?[…]
Read the full draft article:
No comments:
Post a Comment